FORGOT YOUR DETAILS?

Charity donation during COVID-19

AlphaGenes decided to support farmers through the COVID-19 crisis. We donated to The Farming Community Network Organisation as they are helping farm businesses to adapt and stay resilient through this challenging time.

We can all do something to support those who are currently struggling.

Working from home office

COVID-19 has forced the Alphagenes group to rethink our working environment. We are fortunate to continue our work from home. Daily meetings with our colleagues and collaborators are essential to keep in touch.

 

 

We recently published a preprint for how to use high-throughput phenotypes to infer an individuals genotype and enable genomic selection. Using genomic selection is key for increasing genetic gain in breeding programs by more accurately evaluating which individuals to select. However genotyping is expensive. To help make genomic selection more cost effective, AlphaGenes has been researching different ways to decrease genotyping costs over the last 7 years.

One way to decrease genotyping costs is to use genomic imputation. Under this approach, most of the individuals in the population are genotyped using a low-cost and low-density genotyping array, and only a small number of individuals are genotyped using a higher-cost high-density array. We can then use statistical regularities between the low and high-density individuals to impute (or fill in) the ungenotyped markers. The key question is how to balance genotyping costs (by using lower-density marker panels) while maintaining selection accuracy.

This work lies at one end of the spectrum where the goal is to obtain moderate accuracy imputation at very low-costs. For the past few years, we have consistently found that in structured populations(e.g., bi-parental crosses or full-sib families), moderate imputation accuracies can be obtained using 1-5 markers per chromosome. Can we push marker densities even lower? Do we even need genotypes? What if we just had high-throughput phenotypes?

High-throughput phenotypes encapsulate a range of sensor technologies which can be used to non-invasively evaluate phenotypes on large numbers of individuals. Examples include things such as flying a drone with an infrared camera over a field, or sending an animal through a suite a sensors. The advantage of high-throughput phenotypes is that they can be collected at very low costs.

This paper demonstrates (in simulation) that it may be possible to use high-throughput phenotypes as a stand-in for genetic markers to infer genotypes. In order to get moderate imputation accuracies (~0.5), there need to be ~100 quantitative phenotypes measured (traits such as yield, or spectrometry data) each with a heritability of 0.5.

Here’s some intuition for how it works. Imagine you have a bi-parental cross or full-sib family. We assume the parents are genotyped (and phased if they are outbred). Our goal is to impute an offspring based on the high-throughput phenotypes. To do this, (1) we simulate a large number of putative offspring, (2) calculate estimated genetic values for each offspring for each of the high-throughput phenotypes, then (3) impute the offspring by finding simulated genotypes that produce estimated genetic values close to the observed phenotypes. The large possible number of offspring genotypes, means that we cannot simulate all of them by direct simulation so we actually use a sampling approach that does a guided search to find likely haplotypes.

The paper presents just a proof of concept of this idea. We have not tested it on real data, and the number of phenotypes and the heritability of the phenotypes is likely outside of what we could easily (and cheaply) collect. But this idea has a lot of potential: maybe in the future a breeder could fly a drone over a field, or send a pig through a sensor and get very low cost (albeit low-accuracy) genotypes on hundreds or thousands of individuals.

Link: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.02.28.969600v1

 

We have a new preprint posted, showing that recombination rate in the pig is lowly heritable and associated with alleles at RNF212.We developed a new method to estimate recombinations in 150,000 pigs, and used that to estimate heritability and perform genome-wide association studies.

Abstract Background

In this paper, we estimated recombination rate variation within the genome and between individuals in the pig ufor 150,000 pigs across nine genotyped pedigrees. We used this to estimate the heritability of recombination and perform a genome-wide association study of recombination in the pig.ResultsOur results confirmed known features of the pig recombination landscape, including differences in chromosome length, and marked sex differences. The recombination landscape was repeatable between lines, but at the same time, the lines also showed differences in average genome-wide recombination rate. The heritability of genome-wide recombination was low but non-zero (on average 0.07 for females and 0.05 for males). We found three genomic regions associated with recombination rate, one of them harbouring the RNF212 gene, previously associated with recombination rate in several other species.

Conclusion

Our results from the pig agree with the picture of recombination rate variation in vertebrates, with low but nonzero heritability, and a major locus that is homologous to one detected in several other species. This work also highlights the utility of using large-scale livestock data to understand biological processes.

Link: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.03.17.995969v1

 

 

TOP

Privacy Preference Center

    Necessary

    Storing user login information

    wordpress

    Advertising

    Analytics

    Used to maintain session from facebook and twitter

    facebook
    twitter

    Other